Monday, 9 June 2025

Tradition, Sovereignty, and Renewal: A New Path for the Nationalist Party


Between Tradition and Renewal: The PN’s Struggle for Relevance in a Changing Malta

The Malta Today results did not come as a surprise to the PN—it was actually anticipated. Current trends appear to be working against the party. Despite a decline in quality of life due to the country's overcrowding, the economy continues to perform well. In such circumstances, it is difficult for any opposition to succeed without the creativity needed to overcome the situation. To make matters worse for the PN, the party's financial situation appears to be a central factor contributing to its current troubles. Another challenge for the party is finding a centre ground that aligns with its identity—one that doesn’t alienate its grassroots supporters while still appealing to new voters. Striking this balance is no easy task. A party that has succeeded in attracting both liberal and Catholic voters—much like during the tenure of Eddie Fenech Adami—must now find common ground, positioning itself as a conservative party capable of representing a wide spectrum of society.

 


Reclaiming Public Services: Restoring Integrity, Sovereignty, and Social Responsibility

The PN should firmly assert that essential services must remain under state control, because unlike private companies, the state has no profit motive—its only responsibility is to serve the needs of the people. It is unacceptable that €400 million were lost in deals like those with Vitals and Steward, when those funds could have been used to improve the lives of the most vulnerable, particularly the sick. A strong, publicly run hospital system ensures that patients receive care based on need, not profit, and keeps corrupt business interests out of healthcare.

In many countries, people take pride in their national health services—pride that has been eroded in Malta under a Labour government. The PN must show the people that this pride can be restored, and that Malta can once again have a healthcare system that works for everyone.

But it’s not just healthcare. The energy sector has also been compromised. Is it really acceptable that 33% of Enemalta is owned by a Chinese state company? To make matters worse, this deal has been mired in allegations of offshore accounts, kickbacks, and shady dealings. It’s possible that the country lost €7.4 million and $5 million through these arrangements—money that should have gone into improving our energy infrastructure, not lining the pockets of the few.

And beyond the financial loss, there is a deeper concern: a foreign government, through its state-owned enterprises, now holds influence over Malta’s electricity supply. This raises serious questions about sovereignty, transparency, and long-term national interest. The PN must commit to regaining control of our essential services, restoring accountability, and putting the Maltese people—not foreign states or corrupt business networks—at the heart of public policy.


A Vision for Sustainable Growth and National Renewal

The PN must put forward a clear, forward-looking plan for Malta—one that directly addresses the problems created by Labour’s economic model, which has favoured quantity over quality. What the country needs is a strategy focused on sustainable growth, improved infrastructure, and a renewed commitment to preserving both our environment and cultural heritage.

This plan should include the creation of new open spaces in overdeveloped urban areas and the protection of our rural landscapes from further degradation. A more environmentally conscious approach—clearly defined and professionally guided—would show that the PN is serious about long-term quality of life, not just short-term gains.

Equally important is addressing the country’s growing traffic crisis. The PN must champion a strong public transport strategy, developed in consultation with experts in the field, to provide efficient and reliable alternatives to private car use. Reducing congestion and pollution must be a core part of this vision.

At the heart of this plan should be a shift in economic direction: away from a system reliant on imported cheap labour, and towards one that prioritises high-quality, well-paid jobs. New economic projects should aim to attract innovation, talent, and investment that uplifts the country, not strains its resources.

This kind of model will not only raise living standards, but will also ease the pressure on our population by discouraging unsustainable growth. It offers a more balanced future—one that delivers opportunities for citizens and foreign residents alike, while restoring dignity and direction to the national economy.


Balancing Belief and Progress: A Pragmatic Path for the PN

 The PN has long grappled with the challenge of balancing the support of its traditional Catholic base with that of more liberal-minded voters. To remain relevant and representative, the party must adopt a pragmatic approach that respects and includes both perspectives.

The PN must position itself as a future government for all—Catholics, people of other faiths, and non-believers alike. It should reflect the diversity of Maltese society, while still acknowledging and respecting the values of its more conservative grassroots. One way to achieve this balance is by introducing the principle of a free vote on matters of personal morality.

It is essential that the party’s parliamentary group includes individuals who represent the broad spectrum of Maltese public opinion—from conservatives to liberals. This ensures that Catholic voters see their views represented, while also allowing space for differing positions. When it comes to matters of conscience, imposing a uniform party line risks alienating those whose convictions are deeply rooted in their faith.

The PN should therefore focus on being an inclusive political movement—one that unites around common policy goals while allowing room for individual freedom on moral issues. The real debate within the party should be centred on political direction, governance, and national priorities—not moral doctrine.


No comments:

Post a Comment